Legal Opinion
Keith A. Houghtling v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 2013No. 13-171CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for military pay. Plaintiff, Keith A Houghtling, challenges a decision by the Army Board of Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) to deny his application challenging his administrative separation from the U.S. Army. Plaintiff asserts that his separation was wrongful and that he is entitled to back pay and retirement benefits. The United States (“defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim and, alternatively, a motion for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff filed a response…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Meyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.