Legal Opinion
Miller v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 17, 2015No. 13-149CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Suit for military pay and allowances by an ex-Navy Corpsman who was placed on the TDRL, then deemed fit for duty, but then denied reenlistment as unsuitable to serve; application of 10 U.S.C. §§ 1201,1210,1211, and 1214a
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael B. Miller, brings this action against the United States for active duty pay and allowances or, alternatively, for military disability retirement pay and benefits. See Compl. ¶ 1. Plaintiff alleges that the United States Navy “violated [a] statute and its own regulations” by denying him active duty pay and allowances and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021