Legal Opinion

Lippmann v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 13, 2016No. 15-192CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RCFC 12(b)(6); RCFC 12(d); RCFC 52.1; RCFC 56; the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204; 10 U.S.C. § 1169; 14 U.S.C. § 357.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRIGGSBY, Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In this military pay action, plaintiff, Marcus Randolph Lippmann, challenges the United States Coast Guard’s decision to involuntarily retire him from active duty service pursuant to the recommendation of a Career Retention Screening Panel (“CRSP”). The government has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  3. Bruyea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  4. Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API