Lippmann v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 12(b)(6); RCFC 12(d); RCFC 52.1; RCFC 56; the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204; 10 U.S.C. § 1169; 14 U.S.C. § 357.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this military pay action, plaintiff, Marcus Randolph Lippmann, challenges the United States Coast Guard’s decision to involuntarily retire him from active duty service pursuant to the recommendation of a Career Retention Screening Panel (“CRSP”). The government has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Bruyea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.