Legal Opinion
Meyer v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 7, 2016No. 15-1017CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Military pay and disability claim; administrative separation based on nonjudicial conviction for malingering notwithstanding a referral by a Medical Evaluation Board to a Physical Evaluation Board; application of Army Regulations 635-40 and 635-200
OPINION AND ORDER
Charles F. Lettow, Judge
Sarah Jean Meyer seeks military back pay and disability retirement benefits. She enlist ed in the Army and began training in 2010. After an accident during training caused pain in her shoulder, ankle, and hips, a doctor ordered her to avoid a range of physical training activities, such as running and jumping,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and Philip J. SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Cavanagh v. Nevada State MilitiaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Gonzales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.