United States v. Appendagez, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
RAO, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant James Shane’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by the plaintiff to recover civil penalties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592, Tariff Act of 1930, § 592, as amended. The motion is grounded on defendant’s claim that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, that is a Section 1592 claim arising prior to the effective date of the Customs Courts Act of 1980, November 1, 1980; that the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action against defendant James Shane; and that the defendant James Shane is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- United States v. 76,552 Pounds of Frog LegsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- United States v. Menard, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.