Legal Opinion

United States v. Appendagez, Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 15, 1983No. Court 81-8-01014PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAO, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant James Shane’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by the plaintiff to recover civil penalties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592, Tariff Act of 1930, § 592, as amended. The motion is grounded on defendant’s claim that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, that is a Section 1592 claim arising prior to the effective date of the Customs Courts Act of 1980, November 1, 1980; that the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action against defendant James Shane; and that the defendant James Shane is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. United States v. 76,552 Pounds of Frog LegsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
  5. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. United States v. Menard, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API