Legal Opinion

United States v. 76,552 Pounds of Frog Legs

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 10, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 75-B-221PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GARZA, Chief Judge.

This is an action for condemnation of certain adulterated frog legs that were brought into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 301, § 331, and § 334(d)(1) and 19 U.S.C.A. § 1592. The customs statutes, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1592, provide for forfeiture for making false statements when introducing imported merchandise in interstate commerce; the food and drug statutes, 21 U.S.C.A. § 331(a) and § 334(d)(1), provide for condemnation of adulterated or mislabeled foods. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345, since the United States is the Plaintiff, and by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. 484 Bags, More or Less, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Carl Borchsenius Co. v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  3. Otis McAllister & Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Kanasco, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Appendagez, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. United States v. an Article of Device ... DiapulseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Provimi, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API