Legal Opinion
Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1976No. 70 Civ. 4128PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, District Judge.
OPINION
This litigation is a private antitrust action. The plaintiff, Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. [the Co-op], which operates a retail food market, has sued thirty-eight defendants, 1 involved with various facets of the food industry, charging them with conspiring together in an attempt to drive the Co-op out of business, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. 2 As will be described more fully below, the plaintiff has charged that certain defendants contrived to instigate a strike among the plaintiff’s employees which resulted…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Empire Volkswagen Inc. v. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Impro Products, Inc. v. HerrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- International Television Productions Ltd. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Television Division of Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.