Legal Opinion
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Lindberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 1986No. C2-85-1119, C6-85-1141PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This consolidated appeal is from a declaratory judgment action brought by respondent Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco). Safeco alleged that it had no duty to defend appellant Larry Lindberg or to provide coverage for injuries received by appellant Kim Barrett in a boating accident.
The trial court construed the policy to exclude coverage for Barrett’s injuries. It also found Safeco had no duty to defend Lindberg against claims by Barrett. We reverse.
FACTS
The parties have submitted the case on an agreed stipulation of the record pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 110.04.
Appella…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hauer v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. MetPath, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.