Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carlson Marketing Group (“Carlson”) filed this action against two of its excess insurers — defendant Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal”) and defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”) — to determine to what extent each insurer is liable to Carlson for expenses that Carlson incurred in defending and settling two patent-infringement lawsuits. Currently before the Court are five summary-judgment motions, one each by Carlson and Royal, and three by National Union. This is two motions too…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Esther S. Taylor v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ACUITY v. Bryan C. Johnson, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015