Legal Opinion

Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 28, 2007No. 04-CV-3368 PJS/JJGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carlson Marketing Group (“Carlson”) filed this action against two of its excess insurers — defendant Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal”) and defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”) — to determine to what extent each insurer is liable to Carlson for expenses that Carlson incurred in defending and settling two patent-infringement lawsuits. Currently before the Court are five summary-judgment motions, one each by Carlson and Royal, and three by National Union. This is two motions too…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Esther S. Taylor v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ACUITY v. Bryan C. Johnson, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API