Legal Opinion
In Re Banks
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1983No. 83-8PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The matter is before us for our consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility. Respondent has not contested the Board’s recommendation.
The record reveals five separate acts of neglect of professional obligations on the part of respondent, a member of the bar. The Hearing Committee concluded that respondent’s conduct violated 6 DR § 101(AX3), which requires that “A lawyer shall not ... [njeglect a legal matter entrusted to him.” It recommended the sanction of informal censure. The Board on Professional Responsibility agreed with the Hearing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of WhitlockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of LandesbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.