Legal Opinion
Matter of Landesberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 1986No. 86-427PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
The court has before it the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that Respondent Lee Landesberg neglected a case and misrepresented to the client in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3), 2-106(A), and 1-102(A)(4), and should be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and be directed to repay an unearned fee. Upon review of the record 2 we are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, and agree that Respondent’s acts and inaction constituted neglect, misrepresentation, and failure to return an unearned fee in violation of these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Matter of RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of KnoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re DrewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.