Legal Opinion
Herman v. Blockbuster Entertainment Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1998No. 97 Civ. 1562(MJL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Blockbuster Entertainment Group (“Blockbuster”) and Viacom International, Inc. (“Viacom”) (collectively the “Defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Adam Herman, Dionne Durosa-ro-Kelson, Michelle Fitzpatrick, Shawn Davi-la, Kellee Anthony, Kenya Newell, Paulette Ruiz, Lashawnda Bonner, Ashirea Moore, and Fannie Smith (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Velez v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Meng v. Ipanema Shoe Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ferrara v. Oakfield Leasing Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- St. Jean v. Orient-Express Hotels Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.