Legal Opinion
Meng v. Ipanema Shoe Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1999No. 98 Civ. 6790(SAS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Weishao “Sherry” Meng (“plaintiff’ or “Meng”) brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”) alleging wrongful termination based on her race/national origin (Chinese) and quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment. Plaintiff also alleges claims under the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Executive Law § 290, et seq., the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and New York common law. She has sued both her…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- O'DELL v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Velez v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Zakrzewska v. the New SchoolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Figueroa v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.