Legal Opinion

Freitag v. Lund

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1933No. 24475. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This court struck the statement of facts brought up in this case, by reason of which there can be but one assignment of error discussed.

The amended complaint is quite lengthy, and it will not be necessary to set it out at length. In each of the two causes of action in the amended complaint, respondent alleged that appellants were, and now are, at all times hereinafter mentioned, husband and wife, and that all the things hereinafter alleged to have been done by them or either of them were done for the marital community composed of appellants.

The first cause of action alleged an oral agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Lung v. CramWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Constanti v. BarovicWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API