Darnell v. Sallee
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Greene Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.
Appellee’s complaint was for damages on account of a malicious prosecution. There was a trial, verdict for appellee, and judgment thereon over appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The first error assigned is, that “the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The second is, that “the court below erred in overruling the appellant’s demurrer to the complaint.”
The complaint is in two paragraphs.
Neither of these assignments is sufficient to test separately the sufficiency of the several paragraphs. Their effect is simply to assail the complaint as a whole, and one…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Myers v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Raleigh & Heidenheimer Bros. v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State National Bank of Springfield v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hindman v. TimmeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.