Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Hendricks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1895No. 1,428PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee recovered judgment for damages on account of malicious prosecution by appellant.

In the complaint it is averred that appellant, by its officers and agents acting in the line of their duty, wickedly, wrongfully, and maliciously caused an affidavit to he filed with the mayor of Bloomington, charging appellee with the crime of larceny, upon which affidavit there was a hearing before the mayor, and as a result thereof appellee was hound over to the circuit court where said cause afterwards came on for trial when said appellee was acquitted and discharged. It is further averred that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Raleigh & Heidenheimer Bros. v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Poling v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Street v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Penton v. CanningWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Drake v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Indiana Bicycle Co. v. WillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API