Legal Opinion

Tangner v. Brannin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1963No. 39805PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

The parties will herein be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs and defendant own adjoining business buildings in the town of Langley, Mayes •County, and this issue arises out of the fact that the eave of the roof of defendant’s building overhangs his property line so that water is discharged onto plaintiffs’ property allegedly causing deterioration and damage to plaintiffs’ building and furniture therein.

We will first consider defendant’s contention that plaintiffs can have no recovery because defendant has an easement to use the overhanging eave.

Defendan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Keller v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Curry v. Southwall CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Waken v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Spellman v. SherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Blackwell v. Mayes County Utility Services AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Mainka v. MitchussonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Beattie v. STATE EX REL. GRDASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Beattie v. State ex rel. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API