Legal Opinion

Mainka v. Mitchusson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 2006No. 102,424PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge:

¶ 1 This action involves the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ quest for an easement over Appellees’ property in order to access a public road. Appellants are the owners of two tracts of land in Grady County. They operate DM Dozers, a business that includes building highways and bridges. Appellants use several large semi-tractor-trailer trucks to haul equipment from their business to job sites. They filed this action claiming they were entitled to an easement across Appel-lees’ land on a section line that bisects Appel-lees’ property, or in the alternative,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Burkhart v. JacobSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Paschall Properties, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Wells v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Tangner v. BranninSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. HumphreyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. GOODWIN v. BLAKECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API