Legal Opinion

Keller v. Fitzpatrick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1951No. 33988PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in favor of defendants in error, who were plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, who was defendant therein. The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant.

The parties own adjoining lots in block 10, University Place addition to Oklahoma City, which face south on 17th street. The question at issue is the right of plaintiffs to use a driveway on defendant’s lot leading from 17th street to the rear. In their original petition plaintiffs alleged the existence of such right by prescription and asked that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berlin v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Haas v. BrannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Bihss v. SabolisIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gorman v. OvermyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Waken v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Cookson v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. DeWitt v. CavenderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Johnson v. SuttlesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API