Legal Opinion

Waken v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1931No. 20465PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Garfield county in favor of the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff therein, against the plaintiffs in error, who were the defendants therein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.

The action was to enjoin the defendants from making changes in an interior partition wall 'in a building that had been constructed on a lot owned by the plaintiff and a lot owned by the defendants. The trial court heard the evidence and, by the agreement of the parties, viewed the premises. The trial court granted the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cihak v. KlekrIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Morrison v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bihss v. SabolisIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kane v. TemplinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Baldridge v. ZiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keller v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Buttrill v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Curry v. Southwall CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Spellman v. SherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Leeson v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API