Webb v. R.O.A. General, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Appellants R.O.A. General, Inc. (R.O.A.) and William Reagan appeal from two partial summary judgments granted in favor of Roland Webb. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Webb and Reagan were shareholders, directors and officers in R.O.A. since its formation in 1981. R.O.A. resulted from the merger of Reagan Outdoor Advertising, Inc. and Galaxy Outdoor Advertising (Galaxy). Webb had been a director and shareholder in Galaxy. In 1977, Galaxy, through its five-person board of directors, decided to sell both its Wyoming and its Idaho divisions. The Wyoming division was purchased by Eldon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. Dixie Power & Water, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Hall v. Process Instruments & Control, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- Novell, Inc. v. the Canopy Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Smith v. OsguthorpeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- Lee v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.