Legal Opinion

Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1989No. 19676PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiff Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Utah (“Blue Cross”), a nonprofit health service corporation, appeals from a summary judgment granted against it and in favor of defendants State of Utah, Utah State Tax Commission, and Utah State Insurance Department (collectively, “the State”). This judgment upheld against state and federal constitutional challenge a pair of Utah tax statutes. Taken together, these statutes levied a 2.25 percent tax on subscription income received by nonprofit health service corporations and on premium income received by all other insurance companies…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lee v. GaufinUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API