Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Harford Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 11, 1996No. 207, 1995PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This appeal from the Superior Court presents the issue of whether a workers’ compensation carrier is entitled to be reimbursed for amounts it paid to an injured worker without sharing in the costs of the litigation which made reimbursement possible. Despite our decision to the contrary in Cannon v. Container Corp. of Am., Del.Supr., 282 A.2d 614 (1971), we now hold that the language of 19 Del.C. § 2363 requires that the insurance carrier pay a share of the costs of litigation proportionate to the amount of its recovery. The decision of the Superior Court is therefore reversed.

I

T…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  2. Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Jeffries v. Kent County Vocational Technical School District Board of EducationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Stigars v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API