Legal Opinion

In re MFW Shareholders Litigation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 29, 2013No. C.A. No. 6566-CSPublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Chancellor.

I. Introduction

This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacAndrews & Forbes said it would not proceed with any going private transaction that was not approved: (i) by an independent special committee; and (ii) by a vote of a majority of the stockholders unaffiliated with the controlling…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Leal v. MeeksSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  4. In re KKR Financial Holdings LLC Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  5. Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API