In re MFW Shareholders Litigation
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Chancellor.
I. Introduction
This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacAndrews & Forbes said it would not proceed with any going private transaction that was not approved: (i) by an independent special committee; and (ii) by a vote of a majority of the stockholders unaffiliated with the controlling…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Leal v. MeeksSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- In re KKR Financial Holdings LLC Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.