Legal Opinion
The Timken Company v. William E. Simon, Secretary of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 7, 1976No. 75-1177PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:
The District Court enjoined the Secretary of the Treasury from refusing to impose an “antidumping duty” on certain imported goods. On appeal, the Secretary challenges both the jurisdiction of the District Court over this customs-related matter and its view of his responsibilities under the Anti-dumping Act of 1921. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
The Antidumping Act of 1921, 19 U.S.C. §§ 160-73 (1970 and Supp. IV, 1974), was enacted “to prevent actual or threatened injury to a domestic industry resulting from the sale in the United States market of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Tooahnippah v. HickelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weslie C. Haneke v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Cornet Stores v. Azie Taylor Morton, Treasurer of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.