Legal Opinion

United States v. 5.61 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in the County of El Dorado

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 1, 1957No. 7053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

In this action, a proceeding in eminent domain by plaintiff to condemn a right of way for a road on the property of defendant, Rhyolite, Inc., plaintiff has submitted a request for a pretrial order. This matter was presented orally, each party has tendered memoranda in support of his respective position, and the matter is now ready for decision and determination. The sole issue presented by the parties in their memoranda is-whether plaintiff may have a “secondary” easement in the roads sought to be condemned incident to its already existing easements for canals and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Painter v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Eugene C. Walsh and Lois M. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Neal v. Greenfields Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024
  4. State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API