Legal Opinion
Painter v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1891No. 14064PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los “Angeles County, and from an order denying a new-trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
On April 23,1887, the Lake Vineyard Land and Water Association conveyed the land described in the complaint to plaintiffs' grantors. The deed contained the following provisions: —
“ Provided that the said A. Elliott and G. A. Richardson do not construct or allow to be constructed on the above-described land any work that will in any manner injuriously affect the waters or water rights of this association; and it is distinctly understood that the said association reserves the right at all times to enter upon said lands for the purpose of making any repairs or for the development of the waters…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Huntington v. . AsherNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Trustees & Inhabitants of Delhi v. YoumansNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Coon v. Sonoma Magnesite Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.