Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Zeller

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1917No. L. A. No. 3700PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior- Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

In this case an opinion was prepared by the district court of appeal but, subsequently, an order was made transferring the ease to this court, where an opinion was prepared and announced, but a rehearing was granted in order that a further consideration might be had of the action of the superior court in upholding a compensation merely nominal for the taking for use as a public street of a strip of land owned by a street railway and occupied by it for the purposes of its business. Upon further study of the matter a majority of the justices are of the opinion that the superior court erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ferrea v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Central Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Boston Tunnel Co. v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. City of Oakland v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Imperial County Behavioral Health Services v. Joseph W.California Court of Appeal · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API