Boston Tunnel Co. v. McKenzie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from" a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Ejectment to recover a mining claim. Plaintiff had judgment.
Plaintiff is a corporation. In 1877 the demanded property was assessed for the purpose of taxation, to the Boston Tunnel Company. The taxes under such assessment not having been paid, the mining claim was sold on the '2d day of March, 1878, by the tax collector, to John Reister, who received a certificate of sale, and in due time a tax deed of the premises, under which he entered into possession. Defendants hold under the title thus acquired. ......
Defendants appeal from the final judgment and from an order denying a motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greason v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Bradley v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- The West Point Iron. Co. v. . ReymertNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Martin v. MatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ferrea v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Imperial County Behavioral Health Services v. Joseph W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Irwin v. Worcester Paper Box Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- City of Los Angeles v. ZellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Caldwell v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.