Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Schenck

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11165PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in condemnation. The defendant railroad companies were the owners in fee of a strip of land in the City of Oakland 115.272 feet in width and approximately 757 feet in length. The northeasterly 55.272 feet of this strip is in use as a right of way for appellants’ electric suburban railroad, while the southwesterly 60 feet of the strip is not presently devoted to railroad uses. The city brought this action, under the Street Opening Act of 1903, to condemn a strip of land 60 feet wide across the lands of appellants and of defendant Schenek for the purpose of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railway Co. v. City of ConnersvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. HuffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API