Legal Opinion
State v. Garbutt
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 28, 2001No. 00-556, 01-061 and 01-092PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendants Patricia M. Garbutt, James W. Waite and Michael R. Demarchena filed separate appeals from denials of motions to suppress evidence which was obtained by Vermont state police officers while defendants were detained at United States border stations. We consolidated the appeals because they present similar questions of law. On appeal, defendants argue that the suppression motions should have been granted because: (1) the Vermont state police did not have jurisdiction to enter the border stations and arrest defendants without a warrant, (2) we should overrule our decision in State v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MoyaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. PontbriandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. CasillasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MunteanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. LeClaireSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.