State v. Pontbriand
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. The State appeals a trial court order suppressing statements defendant Shawn Pontbriand made to law enforcement officers before his arrest. The trial court found that Pontbriand was in police custody at the time the statements were made, and that the officers improperly reinitiated questioning after Pontbriand invoked his right to counsel. We reverse.
*123¶ 2. In early May 2002, the Chittenden Unit for Special Investigations began investigating Pontbriand’s relationship with the minor daughters of his girlfriend, T.N. During this investigation, T.N. contacted the police after Pontbriand sent…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. JamesIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Gobble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- State v. SoleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.