Legal Opinion

State v. LeClaire

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 24, 2003No. 01-411PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, C J.

¶ 1. Defendant appeals his conviction after a jury found him guilty of murder in the second degree for causing mortal head trauma to a sixteen-month-old child left in his care. Defendant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the Chittenden District Court erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss in which he claimed that the State failed to collect and preserve potentially exculpatory evidence; (2) prohibiting him from introducing certain evidence at trial in his defense; (3) admitting as evidence the statements he made to the police while on furlough; (4) denying…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. PontbriandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. State v. MunteanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. State v. WiggSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. State v. MemoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. RooneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API