Legal Opinion
United States v. Moya
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 12, 1996No. 94-4912PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Francisco Moya asserts that statements he made to an Immigration and Naturalization Service inspector were obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment or Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He thus urges reversal of his conviction (before a jury) for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
I
Moya arrived in Miami International Airport bearing a resident-alien card and a Dominican passport. When an INS inspector ran a computer check on Moya’s resident-alien card, that check yielded a “TECS”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. Meier Jason BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Knight Ex Rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. JayyousiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Stanley StreetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jeffrey Glenn GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.