Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1994No. 93-5770PublishedCited by 1,960 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns the rules for determining whether a person being questioned by law enforcement officers is held in custody, and thus entitled to the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966). We hold, not for the first time, that an officer’s subjective and undisclosed view concerning whether the person being interrogated is a suspect is irrelevant to the assessment whether the person is in custody.

I

Ten-year-old Robyn Jackson disappeared from a playground in Baldwin Park, California, at around 6:30 p.m. on September 28, 1982. Early the next morning, about 10 miles away…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,960 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

1,955 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API