Legal Opinion

Berg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 19, 2013No. CIV. 09-4179-KESPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Deane Berg, brought suit against defendants, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., and others, alleging claims for strict products liability, negligent products liability, breach of warranties, civil conspiracy, and acting in concert. After the court entered various orders following motions by defendants, the claims that remained for trial were Berg’s claims for strict products liability, negligent products liability, breach of warranties, and civil conspiracy *1154a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michael R. DANCY, Appellant, v. HYSTER COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Luther v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J.C., a Minor v. Pfizer, Inc, Roerig, a Division of Pfizer Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Fong v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  3. Foster v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  4. Sluis v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API