Legal Opinion
Foster v. Ethicon, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 26, 2021No. 4:20-cv-04076Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MARSHA FOSTER, and ALVIN A. JENSEN, 4:20-CV-04076-RAL Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER VS. GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ETHICON, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants. This case began in the Southern District of West Virginia as part of the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL). It is one of thousands of cases involving injuries patients allegedly suffered after being implanted with pelvic mesh products designed, manufactured, and sold by Ethicon, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Reed v. City of St. Charles, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.