Legal Opinion

Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2007No. 24132PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Plaintiff was injured when a sports product manufactured by defendant malfunctioned and struck her arm. She brought suit against defendant alleging negligence, strict liability (defective design), and strict liability (failure to warn). Defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims and also sought to prohibit the testimony of her proposed expert witness. On finding that plaintiffs expert was not qualified to testify that the instructions provided with defendant’s product were inadequate, the circuit court excluded the testimony. The court then granted…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. LemlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API