Fortner v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.
James Fortner (movant) was convicted following a jury trial of sodomy in the first degree. See State v. Fortner, 84 S.W.3d 507 (Mo.App.2002). Following incarceration, movant filed a motion for post-conviction relief as permitted by Rule 29.15. Counsel was appointed and an amended motion filed. It was denied following an evidentiary hearing. This court affirms.
The information in the underlying criminal case alleged that movant committed the offense of statutory sodomy in the first degree. It alleged that “[movant] had sexual deviate intercourse with S.S., (DOB 11/13/86)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winfield v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Wright v. RankinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Schmedeke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. FortnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bewley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- McCain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Wilson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Burrage v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.