Legal Opinion

Fortner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2006No. 26832PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

James Fortner (movant) was convicted following a jury trial of sodomy in the first degree. See State v. Fortner, 84 S.W.3d 507 (Mo.App.2002). Following incarceration, movant filed a motion for post-conviction relief as permitted by Rule 29.15. Counsel was appointed and an amended motion filed. It was denied following an evidentiary hearing. This court affirms.

The information in the underlying criminal case alleged that movant committed the offense of statutory sodomy in the first degree. It alleged that “[movant] had sexual deviate intercourse with S.S., (DOB 11/13/86)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winfield v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Wright v. RankinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Schmedeke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. FortnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bewley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. McCain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Wilson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Burrage v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API