Legal Opinion
Wright v. Rankin
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 2003No. 24751, 24765PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.
In No. 24751 Eric (E.J.) Wright and Kevin M. Laughlin (plaintiffs) appeal a judgment declaring John Lewis and David Tate (collectively referred to as defendants) did not purposely violate provisions of Chapter 610 (the Sunshine Law). 1 Defendants cross-appeal in No. 24765 asserting that findings included in the findings and conclusions of the trial court are without evidentiary support and without factual basis. No. 24751 is affirmed. No. 24765 is dismissed. •
Plaintiffs brought an action in which they alleged certain government agencies within Taney County, Missouri,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Harris v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lett v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners v. PalukaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Farrell v. DeClueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foster v. Village of BrowningtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Autumn Ridge Homeowners Ass'n v. OcchipintoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- F.W. Disposal South, LLC v. St. Louis County CouncilMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fortner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- The Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Missouri Baptist FoundationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.