Legal Opinion

Schmedeke v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 2004No. ED 83292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., Judge.

Movant, James Schmedeke, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary, hearing. We reverse and remand.

A jury convicted movant of driving while intoxicated and driving while revoked. Movant was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment for each conviction with the sentences to be served consecutively. Movant appealed from the judgment of conviction and this court affirmed. State v. Schmedeke, 84 S.W.3d 139 (Mo.App.E.D.2002).

Movant filed a pro se and amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant alleged that his trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyons v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State v. SchmedekeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Elverum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Flores v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Fortner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Covington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API