Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1964No. Calendar 125, 126. Docket 49,700, 49,701PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgv ments upon a jury verdict of no cause for action in these automobile negligence cases, consolidated by stipulation both below and here on appeal, and from denial of their motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial. They allege the trial court erred in refusing to grant their motion for a directed verdict made at the close of their own proofs and renewed at close of all proofs. The latter motion alleged defendant was guilty of negligence as a matter of law and asked the general question of damages only be put to the jury. Plaintiffs further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patzer v. Bowerman-Halifax Funeral HomeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rossien v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Budman v. SkoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sacred Heart Aid Society v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hunt v. DemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Vander Laan v. MiedemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API