Legal Opinion
Jankowitz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 14, 1976No. 83-75PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
In this civilian pay case plaintiff sues under the Back Pay Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 94, 95, 5 TJ.'S.C. § 5596 (1970), and 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1970), seeking pay and allowances which he would have earned had he not been made the object of an adverse personnel action.1 Defendant has lodged in its responsive pleading an affirmative defense of setoff of damages for “deceit,” as the alternative to its first counterclaim, under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 231 et seg. (1970), as well as a second counterclaim for return of alleged bribes, gratuities, kickbacks, and similar illegal payments to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Alemany RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Kirkland Masonry, Inc., Hugh Kirkland and Bobye Joe Kirkland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.