Legal Opinion

Sauers v. Poulin Bros. Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 1997No. 2743PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Chief Judge:

Warren and Nancy Sauers (the Homeowners) filed an action against Poulin Brothers Homes, Inc. (Poulin), their general contractor, and others over problems with the construction of their new home. Poulin asserted third-party indemnification claims against various subcontractors, including Lee Moore Plastering (Moore), the subcontractor responsible for applying *604the stucco exterior of the house. Before trial, all claims except Poulin’s indemnification claim against Moore settled, and the case proceeded to trial. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Moore. Poulin appeals,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Brady Development Co. v. Town of Hilton Head IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Garrett v. LockeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fickling v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Maull v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API