Legal Opinion

Brady Development Co. v. Town of Hilton Head Island

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 1993No. 23974PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Acting Associate Justice:

The Town of Hilton Head (the Town) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that the Town owed Brady Development Co., Inc. (Brady) a special duty in the administration of its Development Standards Ordinance. The jury found for Brady in the amount of $215,000 actual damages. The Town argues that the trial judge erred in denying its motions for a directed verdict. We agree and reverse.

I. Facts

On December 10, 1984, the Hilton Head Company (Company), developers of a 244-lot single-family subdivision known as Indigo Run Plantation Phase III, applied for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Bellamy v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hannon v. CounihanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adams v. GJ Creel and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Tanner v. Florence County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Carolina Chemical Equipment Co. v. MuckenfussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API