Brady Development Co. v. Town of Hilton Head Island
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Acting Associate Justice:
The Town of Hilton Head (the Town) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that the Town owed Brady Development Co., Inc. (Brady) a special duty in the administration of its Development Standards Ordinance. The jury found for Brady in the amount of $215,000 actual damages. The Town argues that the trial judge erred in denying its motions for a directed verdict. We agree and reverse.
I. Facts
On December 10, 1984, the Hilton Head Company (Company), developers of a 244-lot single-family subdivision known as Indigo Run Plantation Phase III, applied for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Bellamy v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Hannon v. CounihanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Adams v. GJ Creel and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Tanner v. Florence County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Carolina Chemical Equipment Co. v. MuckenfussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.