Legal Opinion
Vinson v. Hartley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 14, 1996No. 2572PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Mark Vinson (Vinson) sued Patricia Hartley (Hartley) for damages for injuries he alleged he received in an automobile collision with Hartley. Hartley admitted negligence but contested whether the accident was the proximate cause of Vinson’s injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Hartley. The trial court denied Vinson’s motions for reformation of the verdict, new trial nisi additur, and new trial absolute. Vinson appeals the denial of these motions. We affirm. 1
FACTSIPBOCEDUBAL BACKGBOUND
On September 26, 1992, Vinson and Hartley were involved in an automobile…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Hawkins v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- McNair v. RainsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.