Fickling v. City of Charleston
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, J.:
Patricia Fickling brought this negligence action against the City of Charleston after she stepped into a hole in a sidewalk and fell, sustaining injuries. The sidewalk was located within the municipal limits, but on a right-of-way owned by the State of South Carolina. The trial court, sitting without a jury, granted the City’s motion for a “directed verdict,” 1 finding as a matter of law the City had no duty to inspect and repair the sidewalk under South Carolina statutory law, general common law, or the theory of a voluntary undertaking. The trial court further found the City had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Todd v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Keen v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Major v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Major v. City of HartsvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Padgett v. Colleton CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Major v. City of HartsvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Montgomery Holdings, LLC v. Christopher J. MerloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026