Legal Opinion
Hanselmann v. McCardle
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 2, 1980No. 21192PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is an action for malpractice instituted by the husband of Sommai Hanselmann, deceased, as administrator against the surgeon, Dr. Robert J. McCardle, internist, Dr. Charles S. Bryan, pathologist, Dr. Hoke F. Henderson, lab technician, Carmelisa Edwards, and lab assistant, Flonnie Brooks. The trial court granted an involuntary nonsuit as to all respondents. We affirm.
On May 25, 1978, Mrs. Hanselmann was admitted to Richland Memorial Hospital under Dr. McCardle’s care. Numerous tests were performed, but no positive diagnosis of the cause of Mrs. Hanselmann’s hemoptysis was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. Children's Clinic, P. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- McCown v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Bessinger v. De LoachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Armstrong Ex Rel. Estate of Armstrong v. WeilandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Kemmerlin v. WingateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.