Legal Opinion

Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1950No. 665PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

It is a basic rule of pleading that a complaint must allege every material fact necessary to sustain the right of the plaintiff to the relief which he seeks. Potter v. Supply Co., 230 N.C. 1, 51 S.E. 2d 908. In consequence, we confront this primary question at the threshold of this appeal: Where a stockholder applies for a writ of mandamus to compel the directors of a corporation .to declare and pay a dividend, must he allege in his complaint that the corporation has surplus or net profits available for the payment of such dividend at the time when the action is brought and the application…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Christ v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re T.H.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Moody v. Transylvania CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API