Legal Opinion

Moody v. Transylvania County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1967No. 36PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

Two questions arise upon this appeal. Is ambulance service a necessary expense for which the County Commissioners may legally contract? If such contract is ultra vires, must it be pleaded by the defendant, or is it proper ground for demurrer? The appellant’s position cannot be sustained on either question.

In Madry v. Scotland Neck, 214 N.C. 461, 199 S.E. 618, Barn-hill, J. (later C.J.) made this concise statement:

“A municipality is a creature of the Legislature and it can only exercise (1) the powers granted in express terms; (2) those necessarily or fairly implied in or incident to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. In re T.H.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Bowers v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Pritchard v. Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API